ASN Wikibase Occurrence # 296309
This information is added by users of ASN. Neither ASN nor the Flight Safety Foundation are responsible for the completeness or correctness of this information.
If you feel this information is incomplete or incorrect, you can submit corrected information.
| Date: | Wednesday 1 January 2003 |
| Time: | 16:55 LT |
| Type: |  Van's RV-6A |
| Owner/operator: | |
| Registration: | N559LJ |
| MSN: | 25559 |
| Total airframe hrs: | 298 hours |
| Engine model: | Lycoming O-320-E2D |
| Fatalities: | Fatalities: 0 / Occupants: 1 |
| Aircraft damage: | Substantial |
| Category: | Accident |
| Location: | Peachtree City, Georgia -
 United States of America
|
| Phase: | Unknown |
| Nature: | Private |
| Departure airport: | Waycross-Ware County Airport, GA (AYS/KAYS) |
| Atlanta-Peachtree City Falcon Field, GA (KFFC) | |
| Investigating agency: | NTSB |
| Confidence Rating: |  Accident investigation report completed and information captured |
The flight departed with full fuel tanks from the Waycross-Ware County Airport, en route to the Peachtree City Airport. About 1 hour into the flight the pilot noticed a slight rpm drop, he applied throttle to compensate for the rpm decrease. The pilot started the pre-descent procedures; he turned the auxiliary fuel pump on, applied carburetor heat, then reduced power, at this time the engine quit completely. The pilot repositioned the fuel selector, switched the auxiliary fuel pump off and on, turned carburetor heat on and off, all actions were unsuccessful in restoring engine power. The pilot established best glide airspeed, lowered full flaps, and while descending, the airplane contacted a raised sewer access. The airplane then impacted the ground and came to rest inverted. A witness reported observing black smoke trailing the airplane and heard the engine running rough. Examination of the airplane following recovery by an FAA inspector revealed the fuel tank vent lines were clear of obstructions. There was fuel found in the left wing and the right fuel tank was leaking fuel, the fuel boost pump operated electrically post accident. Fuel samples from the right wing and gascolator showed no fuel contamination. All spark plugs and inside ends of both exhaust pipes were found sooted. The carburetor heat system which consists of a 5 inches long by 2 inches in diameter pipe secured to the exhaust crossover pipe, a "Carb Heat Connector" which is secured to the filtered air box forward of the air filter, and a scat hose that connects the two. Additionally, a control in the cockpit activates an alternate air door located on the filtered air box forward of the carb heat muff inlet The carburetor heat was able to function post accident and the engine was run to idle power setting; damage precluded operation at a higher rpm setting. Bench testing of the carburetor by the manufacturer with FAA oversight revealed the carburetor was not within service limits, at comparable to idle power settings the fuel flow in terms of pounds-per-hour (pph) was 0.6 pph below service limits. At the remaining four test points the fuel flow in pph was greater than the established rich limits. At the last test point which equated to full throttle, the fuel flow was 18.5 pph above the established rich service limit. The pilot reported verbally that approximately 50 flight hours earlier, when he was taxiing to takeoff, the engine quit just like it did during the accident flight. The carburetor and engine driven fuel pump were replaced. The engine quit again in a similar fashion, and the auxiliary fuel pump and all fuel lines were replaced. Additionally, the fuel selector valve was disassembled and rebuilt. The overhauled carburetor had been operated 54.5 hours since installation at the time of the accident. The temperature and dew point at Peachtree city, two hours past the time of the accident, indicates serious carburetor icing at any power setting. Flight testing of a RV6A airplane equipped with the same carburetor heat system, same model engine, and same model carburetor as the accident airplane but with a temperature probe revealed that with the engine operating at 75 percent power and carburetor heat applied, the temperature rise was 1/2 degree Fahrenheit above the temperature with carburetor heat off. According to the general manager of Van's Aircraft, they offer 2 different types of carburetor heat systems, and they have not done any heat rise testing on any of the various carburetor heat systems that can be installed on RV type airplanes. With respect to carburetor heat muffs, a section of the builders manual states that each builder is responsible for evaluating his/her own installation based on the liklihood of carburetor ice in his/her intended operating environment.
Probable Cause: The failure of the pilot to activate carburetor heat control during cruise flight after experiencing a loss of engine rpm, inadequate carburetor heat system by the builder, and the unsuitable terrain encountered by the pilot-in-command during the forced landing following the total loss of engine power. A factor in the accident was the weather conditions ( temperature and dew point) which were susceptible to carburetor icing during cruise flight and descent.
Accident investigation:
 |
|
Sources:
NTSB MIA03LA035
Revision history:
| Date/time | Contributor | Updates |
|---|---|---|
| 13-Oct-2022 19:04 | ASN Update Bot | Added |
Corrections or additions? ... Edit this accident description
The Aviation Safety Network is an exclusive service provided by:
Quick Links:
| ASN Home | Send Correction / Feedback |
| FSF Home | Disclaimer | Copyright |
| Contact Us | Privacy Policy |
| Press / Media |
CONNECT WITH US:
©2024 Flight Safety Foundation